TESCO PLC , Responsibility & Role of Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of for-profit corporations oversees management and strategy. It usually consists of shareholders or owners’ elected or appointed representatives. The main reasons for-profit organisations have boards of directors are accountability, strategic direction, and shareholder protection. As fiduciaries, they make choices that benefit the organisation and its stakeholders, focusing on profitability and shareholder value. The Board establishes business policy, hires and oversees executives, approves budgets and makes crucial decisions like mergers and acquisitions. The Board’s goal is to maximise financial performance and shareholder value (Darko et al., 2016).
For-profit company directors:
Directors in for-profit firms have several duties. Their fiduciary obligation is to serve the firm and shareholders first. Strategic planning involves directors creating goals and ensuring the Company’s operations support its purpose and vision. They appoint, assess, and replace CEOs and control executive salaries. Directors also manage risk by ensuring the firm follows laws and regulations and prevents ethical or financial misbehaviour. They approve budgets and financial reports for the Company’s finances. They also make critical dividends, capital allocation, and corporate action choices to maximise shareholder value.
Non-profit Board of Directors: Nature and Rationale
Boards of Directors in non-profits perform similar purposes as for-profits but with some major distinctions. The Board oversees mission, strategy, and governance. Non-profit boards are usually made up of people who care about the organisation’s mission and want to achieve its objectives rather than maximise earnings. Non-profit organisations need boards of directors to provide transparency, accountability, and resource management to meet their social or philanthropic objectives. The Board helps non-profits gain public confidence, acquire money, and manage resources effectively to fulfil their social or humanitarian goals (Zhu et al., 2014).
Non-profit Directors’ Duties:
Directors in non-profits have several duties. They define and maintain the organisation’s purpose and values, ensuring all actions comply. To finance the organisation’s operations, board members frequently assist in raising contributions, grants, and other resources. They give strategic direction, supervise the organisation’s finances, and ensure programming activities meet the purpose. Non-profit directors must handle difficult regulatory and compliance challenges to preserve tax-exempt status and comply with applicable legislation. They ensure the organisation’s mission’s long-term viability and effect on the community or sector it serves as stewards.
Section #1: The role and responsibilities of directors in private of TESCO PLC.
The Board of Directors at TESCO oversees the Company’s management, direction, and performance, always considering shareholder interests. The robust governance system guarantees the Board has adequate supervision of Group-material items. The Group’s delegation of power ensures that the appropriate colleagues make choices at the right level of the organisation. The Board and its Committees prioritise good governance throughout the Group. This aids the Board in accomplishing strategic goals and KPIs. The Board sets the Company’s mission, values, and behaviours. TESCO culture helps us achieve our vision and succeed long-term while creating shareholder value. The Board is ultimately responsible for securing sufficient resources to accomplish goals and strategy (Naciti, 2019).
Role of the Board of Directors of TESCO
The Board is accountable for the Company’s management, direction, and performance and must always keep its stakeholders’ needs in mind. The governance system guarantees the Board is adequately monitoring Group-critical issues. The Group’s delegation of power explicitly guides decision-making, guaranteeing that business choices are made at the appropriate level and by the most qualified coworkers. The Board puts a premium on establishing a high level of governance across the Group with the help of its Committees. The Board is ultimately accountable for allocating sufficient funds to implement the plan and achieve the set goals.
The Audit Committee of TESCO
It provides an unbiased study of the processes involved in financial reporting and monitoring those processes, including any important internal controls, risk management, and compliance requirements. In addition, it examines the degree to which the internal and external auditing functions are successfully performing the responsibilities that have been assigned to them (Kalbuana et al., 2022).
The Corporate Responsibility Committee of TESCO
Ensures that the Group’s efforts to enhance its sustainability are being managed properly to ensure that they can make a positive contribution to the organisation’s purpose and accomplish its strategic objectives.
The Nominations and Governance Committee
Examines the composition of the Board, focusing on its individual members’ qualifications, length of service, and total number of members. In addition, it is responsible for administrating the process by which new appointments are made, evaluating issues concerning independence, diversity, inclusion, and group governance, and the development of a succession plan for both the Board of directors and senior management.
The Remunerations Committee
It is responsible for creating the pay strategy and packages for top managers and Executive Directors, taking into consideration the remuneration throughout the Group as well as the opinions of stakeholders. This responsibility falls within the purview of the pay committee. The Compensation Committee is the one that is in charge of executing this obligation.
Nominations and Selections
Directors are selected mostly based on how well their skills, knowledge, and experience mesh with those of the Company. There has been a new push to include considerations of gender, race, and age in the nomination process to guarantee a more representative set of viewpoints in the boardroom. Current board members, who deeply understand the Company’s dynamics; shareholders, who have a vested interest; and sometimes external search firms, to identify potential candidates with the right skill set, all contribute to the nomination process (Rodriguez-Fernandez, 2016).
Onboarding & Orientations
Once a director has been nominated and appointed, he or she will begin an onboarding and orientation process to learn more about the Company. As part of this preparation, they will get well acquainted with the norms and policies of the Company’s governance, culture, and values. To ensure that they are equipped for their positions, they undergo training that addresses their fiduciary responsibilities, legal obligations, and sector particulars. During this time, the new hire should focus on gathering the information necessary to make educated decisions about the Company’s operations, strategy, and competitive environment (Zhu et al., 2014).
Evolution during tenure.
Directors who have been on the Board for a while become more successful as they gain expertise and familiarity with the Company’s inner workings. Market situations, legal frameworks, and technology developments need a nimble and responsive organisation. Many directors keep themselves abreast of developments in their fields via pursuits like ongoing education and professional development (Darko et al., 2016).
End of Appointment
The term of a director’s appointment might expire in a number of ways. Some directors’ terms terminate in the next 3 years because of term restrictions in the organisation’s bylaws, while others may willingly step down from their positions. Some people may decide to leave due to internal changes or external factors.
NEDs at TESCO’s independent opinions improve a board’s performance and are crucial to corporate governance. Their independence from the Company’s daily operations allows them to offer unbiased monitoring and impartiality, which is essential for analysing executive actions and protecting shareholders and stakeholders. NEDs’ industry skills and experience enable them to guide the Board’s strategy, develop the Company’s long-term vision, and assess its effectiveness. They also challenge management’s risk assessments and mitigation methods to uncover and address issues that executives may miss.
NEDs improve organisational openness and accountability in addition to strategic contributions. Their presence encourages good governance, keeps CEOs responsible, and assures company-best choices. NEDs also facilitate communication between the Board and stakeholders, representing shareholders, workers, and regulators. This promotes harmony and trust.
Statutory directors’ responsibilities and acts are legally obligatory for executive and non-executive directors. While jurisdictions differ, the underlying principles usually include numerous essential obligations. Directors must act with reasonable care, skill, and effort to fulfil their duty of care. They must make educated judgments, keep updated about the organisation, and use their expertise for the Company. A duty of loyalty requires directors to avoid conflicts of interest and put the Company’s interests before their own.
Liabilities of Board Members:
Directors of a TESCO are subject to substantial legal obligations and risks. Directors have a fiduciary obligation to the business and its shareholders, which requires them to always do what is right. Directors have a duty of care that requires them to make decisions with due diligence and caution. The offender may be liable if violating these norms causes financial loss to the firm or its stakeholders. Directors have a responsibility of loyalty and must not act in a way that might be detrimental to the firm, such as engaging in self-dealing or conflicts of interest (Naciti, 2019).
Director Disqualification:
There are substantial consequences that may ensue, one of which is disqualification from acting as a director. If a firm’s directors fail to meet their statutory responsibilities in connection with bankruptcy proceedings, they may be disqualified from further involvement in the administration of the insolvent Company. Also disqualifying are criminal convictions, especially those involving fraud, dishonesty, or business malfeasance. In addition, disqualification might result from unmet tax liabilities such as interest and penalties. A director may be removed from office for repeated or serious breaches of fiduciary obligations or misbehaviour. Directors should be aware of the possible disqualifying circumstances and take all necessary steps to ensure they comply with the law.
Directors Activities
Directors are essential to the management and decision-making processes of every organisation. Everything from long-term planning to managing day-to-day operations is within their purview. They must ensure the firm complies with all applicable laws and ethical standards while simultaneously working to increase profits for stockholders.
Directors Compensation
Compensation for directors’ services varies greatly based on factors such as firm size, sector, and position. Compensation packages generally contain a mix of fees, stock options, and other incentives to better connect their interests with the firm’s success. Shareholders disclose and approve the directors’ salaries to promote corporate transparency and accountability (Kalbuana et al., 2022).
Conflicts of interest
The directors’ obstacles when dealing with conflicts of interest may be substantial. A conflict of interest exists when a director’s fiduciary obligation to the business interferes with their personal interests or connections. Directors must openly acknowledge and address conflicts of interest, often by avoiding participation in related deliberations and decisions. The Company’s interests are protected, and the decision-making process is honest.
Developments of Directors
Training and education for board members are crucial to good corporate governance. Directors are typically provided opportunities for further education and training inside their companies. Directors who engage in lifelong learning are better prepared to respond to new opportunities, evolving regulations, and evolving best practices. To further improve decision-making and governance, diversity and inclusion efforts seek to increase the number of competent directors present in boardrooms (Rodriguez-Fernandez, 2016).
Ethics at TESCO
Directors at Tesco, a global retailer, are expected to uphold a code of ethics based on ethical and sustainable business operations. Important factors include fostering ethical supplier relationships, maintaining customer trust through fair pricing and open practices, prioritising environmental sustainability, engaging in corporate social responsibility, promoting employee welfare and diversity, adhering to laws and regulations, protecting data privacy, upholding transparency and accountability, combating corruption and bribery, prioritising health and safety, and complying with all applicable laws and regulations. Tesco’s image and long-term retail performance depend on upholding these ethical ideals.
Stewardship concept at TESCO
Tesco’s stewardship idea is an example of responsible and long-term business strategies. It includes things like excellent corporate governance, ethical behaviour, a focus on the long term, the customer, community involvement, supplier fairness, and risk management. This idea represents Tesco’s dedication to serving its employees, customers, and the community via ethical management and sustainable practices (Naciti, 2019).
Stakeholders at TESCO
Customers, shareholders, workers, suppliers, communities, regulators, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), rivals, investors, media, trade unions, environmental groups, and many more are all considered stakeholders by Tesco. These groups have something to gain from Tesco’s continued success and operation, whether it’s customers’ happiness or the Company’s bottom line. Tesco works with these groups to satisfy its corporate responsibility and environmental goals while also addressing the concerns of its many stakeholders.
Corporate Social Responsibility at TESCO
CSR is the practice by a corporation of acting ethically and responsibly toward the communities in which it operates. Employees, customers, communities, and the environment are just a few groups whose interests must be considered while running a business. When it comes to corporate social responsibility, the Board of directors is crucial in establishing the direction and objectives of the firm. They are responsible for CSR efforts and ensure the Company follows all rules and regulations, is ethical, helps the community grow, and has little environmental impact. The Board of Directors must ensure that the Company’s goals and CSR initiatives are in harmony to maximise the Company’s beneficial social and financial effect (Fuente et al., 2017).
ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) AT TESCO:
When assessing a company’s commitment to sustainability and ethical business practices, investors and other stakeholders often look to a set of criteria known as ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance). As the watchdogs of the Company’s ESG performance and transparency, directors play a crucial role in ESG. They push ESG efforts forward by improving governance, addressing social challenges, and adopting sustainable business practices. Directors may strengthen the Company’s brand, attract socially responsible investors, and lessen ESG-related risks by prioritising these factors.
Shareholder’s and Stakeholder’s Activism at TESCO:
Activism on the part of shareholders and other stakeholders, in which shareholders (usually investors in the firm) take action to try to change the Company’s policies or practices. Shareholder value may be increased through lobbying for adjustments to governance, CEO remuneration, or business strategy. When faced with shareholder activism, board members must act in the firm’s best interests while communicating with and responding to shareholders. Directors address the concerns of activist stakeholders and engage with them to find solutions consistent with the Company’s CSR and ESG objectives as part of their role in managing stakeholder activism (Fuente et al., 2017).
Directors at TESCO play a crucial role in the organisation’s success and responsible corporate governance by creating, monitoring, and reporting risk strategies and compliance. Their significance in these core domains is explained below.
Risk Strategies
The TESCO Board of Directors is responsible for defining the Company’s risk strategy. Risks that might affect the Company’s operations, reputation, and financial performance must be identified and evaluated. Directors collaborate closely with the senior management team to define acceptable levels of risk and effective strategies for mitigating such risks. They check to see if these plans align with the Company’s goals and ideals. Supply chain, market, regulatory, and cyber security risks are just some of the many that may factor into TESCO’s risk strategy as a global retail powerhouse. The Board of directors is responsible for developing comprehensive risk mitigation strategies in conjunction with the appropriate departments and experts.
Monitoring Risk
Directors play an essential role in the continuous monitoring of hazards. Every department and risk management team in the Company reports to them often with updates and reports. New threats, compliance concerns, and the success of risk-reduction strategies may all be gleaned from these reports. The Board of directors is responsible for ensuring that all risks are identified, discussed, and mitigated promptly. The hazards that TESCO must monitor include interruptions in the supply chain, economic shifts, competitive pressures, and adherence to rules and standards. For objective reviews of risk management procedures, boards of directors might set up risk committees or bring in outside experts (Rodriguez-Fernandez, 2016).
Reporting on Compliance
Directors are accountable for monitoring and reporting on the organisation’s adherence to all applicable laws, regulations, and internal rules. They make sure that the business does the right thing morally and legally. The Board of Directors collaborates with the Company’s legal and compliance departments to build compliance procedures and policies. TESCO’s compliance reporting aims to demonstrate the Company’s dedication to doing the right thing by its stakeholders, shareholders, and regulators. Shareholders and other stakeholders may be updated on compliance efforts and results via annual reports, regulatory filings, and other channels of communication.
“Collegiate Culture and Power of CEO.
An overbearing CEO or pervasive “collegiate culture” on the Board might stifle directors’ capacity to make objective decisions. Directors may find it easier to criticise choices or tactics offered by the CEO if there is a culture of compliance in the boardroom. To properly carry out their oversight obligations, directors should foster an environment of free and constructive discussion and preserve their independence (Rodriguez-Fernandez, 2016).
Section 2: The role and responsibilities of directors in government (non-for-profits) organisations
The Board of Directors of the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom is the NHS’s highest governing body. This Board is responsible for setting NHS policy and directing its daily operations. The Board usually comprises a wide range of experts in their respective fields. Medical professionals, healthcare managers, and community members may all play a role in considering diverse viewpoints. The NHS is managed by a series of boards organised in a hierarchical framework. For all of England’s National Health Service (NHS), the highest-level Board is the National Health Service England Board. It’s a major factor in deciding what gets prioritised at the federal level regarding healthcare (Harangozó & Zilahy, 2015).
The NHS Board of Directors is responsible for various corporate governance activities. Among the tasks at hand is establishing the NHS’s long-term vision and objectives, which will serve as a compass. As part of this process, we must allocate resources such as money and people to ensure healthcare is delivered effectively. This includes ensuring the National Health Service follows all applicable rules and laws on patient care. The Board of Directors selects top management, including the CEO, to run the Company efficiently. Collectively, these responsibilities strengthen NHS governance, ensuring that the organisation can continue to be transparent and accountable while still providing high-quality healthcare to its constituents (Selden & Sowa, 2015).
In most cases, the NHS Board consists of several positions, each of which has a unique set of duties:
- Executive directors are senior managers in charge of a particular department, such as operations, finance, or healthcare delivery.
- Non-executive directors provide the Board with outside, objective insight. They are essential in ensuring that decisions are made with the public’s and patient’s best interests in mind by carefully examining and questioning them.
- The Chairman is in charge of running board meetings, presiding over board debates, and representing the NHS in public. The Board’s agenda is generally established and carried out with their help.
Directors within the NHS are selected for their proven track records of success in medicine, administration, and public service. Appointing those helps achieve the goal of putting together a well-rounded board of directors. It is not uncommon for directors to grow into new responsibilities as they acquire experience and adjust to the ever-changing healthcare system. This transformation entails keeping abreast of developments in healthcare policy, technology, and patient requirements. Directors may only stay successful in their positions, committed to lifelong learning and professional growth. They need to be aware of new developments and best practices in healthcare administration (Zhu et al., 2014).
The Board’s NEDs play a crucial function in the Board’s structure. This guarantees they may give management impartial analysis and criticise choices since they are not beholden to management. Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) serve as a check to make sure the Board is looking out for the public and patient’s best interests and not only looking out for the Company’s bottom line. Their participation improves the NHS’s openness, accountability, and decision-making process (Fyall, 2016).
Directors in the NHS have several legal responsibilities. These responsibilities are enforceable under law and include, among other things (Harangozó & Zilahy, 2015):
- Serving the interests of the NHS and its goal to deliver healthcare to the public.
- Avoiding conflicts of interest when personal interests might impair the impartiality of decision-making and
- Performing their duties with due diligence requires making informed judgments based on available facts and expert advice.
If directors violate their legal responsibilities or act recklessly, they may be subject to personal liability and disqualification under Article 8 of the Companies Act. They may be removed if a director is deemed unsuitable for office owing to misbehaviour, financial bankruptcy, or any other disqualifying cause. The NHS and its constituents need this safeguard against those who would not behave in their best interests. Directors must ensure that the NHS complies with applicable legislation and ethical standards to limit their legal exposure and protect the organisation’s credibility (Mitchell et al., 2015).
In their responsibilities, directors must deal with several serious concerns, including Dealing with potential biases. Directors have a responsibility to be transparent about any possible conflicts of interest and to make decisions that put the interests of the Company ahead of any personal or external ties they may have. It also has an open and honest compensation plan. Directors should receive equitable, clear, and reasonable salaries in light of their dedication to public service and in keeping with the ethos of the NHS. Taking care of these problems is essential to keeping the NHS’s governing system trustworthy, honest, and ethical (Fyall, 2016).
As the healthcare industry develops, the demands placed on directors rise. Directors are responsible for ensuring that healthcare services are patient-centred and adaptable to new and emerging patient requirements. Directors must answer to the taxpayers and policymakers whose money supports and benefits from the National Health Service. The National Health Service (NHS) must be flexible to deal with changing demographics, new medical technology, and financial restraints. Directors are essential for making it through these transformations (Zhu et al., 2014).
Directors should always act following the highest medical ethics. To achieve this goal, healthcare providers must always act with honesty, respect, and concern for their patients. It is essential to manage resources responsibly. Directors are responsible for ensuring that all available financial, human, and other resources are used effectively so that the NHS can offer the highest quality treatment possible. Participation from key stakeholders is required. To make educated choices that benefit all parties involved, directors must consider the needs of patients, healthcare providers, taxpayers, and the community (Sanders, 2013).
The National Health Service (NHS) adheres to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) tenets, which call for morally and socially sound action. These efforts encourage ethical corporate practices, community well-being, and environmental sustainability. The NHS’s governance structure also incorporates environmental, social, and governance (ESG) aspects. Sustainable practices, patient-centred care, and community involvement are all goals toward which directors must work diligently. CSR and ESG practices help the NHS gain credibility, earn the confidence of its constituents, and secure its future (Selden & Sowa, 2015).
Directors are accountable for establishing risk strategies and compliance within the NHS and reporting on their implementation and performance. The organisation’s capacity to detect and respond to risks linked to patient safety, financial stability, and changes in healthcare legislation depends on its risk management strategy. The National Health Service (NHS) relies on strong governance to guarantee that it will always provide safe, high-quality treatment to its patients.
- The core Role of the Directors in defining, monitoring and reporting risk strategies and compliance.
Directors are crucial in determining how the NHS will deal with potential threats. This entails recognising hazards, evaluating their possible consequences, and creating strategies to deal with them. They keep an eye on how these plans are being implemented to ensure they are still producing results and contributing to the organisation’s overall objectives. Transparency and adherence to regulations demand that risk strategies and compliance be reported regularly. Directors keep regulators and other interested parties up-to-date on a consistent basis to show that risks are being properly handled (Jaskyte, 2014).
Directors must often overcome real-world obstacles such as these. Careful resource allocation is required to address patient requirements if healthcare expenditures are tight. Directors in the healthcare industry face a challenging legal and regulatory environment due to the sector’s extensive regulation. Directors need to find a middle ground between catering to the specific requirements of their communities and lowering the bar for healthcare quality throughout the country. The capacity to quickly shift gears, make calculated decisions and coordinate with relevant parties is essential for meeting these problems (Sanders, 2013).
Directors may improve their performance by doing the following:
- Keeping abreast of developments in healthcare, new technology, and governance best practices.
- An example of stakeholder engagement is connecting with healthcare providers, patient advocates, and policymakers to solicit their input.
- Continuing education and training to stay abreast of the latest developments in healthcare governance.
- Networking is working with others in the same or similar fields to exchange information and ideas.
Directors may use these methods to strengthen governance procedures, increase stakeholder engagement, and improve their decision-making quality.
Avoiding personal culpability necessitates that directors fully grasp their legal and ethical responsibilities. Patient safety must be a top priority because of the potential for injury and legal consequences in the event of carelessness. Protecting the NHS’s basic ideals of healthcare for all is a vital role that directors must prioritise to reduce legal and ethical concerns, and so is keeping the public updated on the organisation’s financial standing.
Section 3:
Final Reflections.
By comparing the functions of directors in for-profit corporations and government agencies, I could better understand the contrasts between the two. Privately owned and operated businesses do so because they generate a profit for their shareholders. Government agencies, on the other hand, have a clear purpose and focus on providing vital services to citizens (Li, 2018).
Directors of for-profit businesses often prioritise increasing the Company’s bottom line. Their responsibilities include providing visionary direction, overseeing risk, and looking out for the best interests of shareholders. Government agency directors are responsible for safeguarding the public interest, including monitoring policies, managing finances, and guaranteeing efficient service delivery.
The results of this comparison highlight the wide range of skills necessary for these positions. Directors of for-profit businesses must have solid financial literacy, extensive market experience, and an intuitive grasp of how to make decisions that maximise profits. On the other hand, government agency directors must be policy experts, adept at communicating with various constituencies and dedicated to upholding the highest ethical standards.
The importance of ethics was discovered. Directors in both public and private organisations must make moral decisions. Directors of for-profit companies must weigh the interests of shareholders with those of other stakeholders and society at large. Because of their responsibility for public funds and welfare, government directors must always act ethically.
These functions are distinguished by accountability systems and governance structures. Directors of for-profit companies are answerable to both shareholders and authorities. Their leadership prioritises increasing profits while staying within the law and upholding ethical standards. Directors of government agencies must answer to citizens, watchdog groups, and elected authorities. Public service, openness, and compliance with the law and regulations are important to this kind of governance.
The primary contrast is between serving the public interest and serving one’s own financial interests. While both need strong leadership, their motivations and end objectives differ. Directors of government agencies act as trustees of public funds, with the responsibility of ensuring that these funds are used for the benefit of all citizens. The basic goal of a for-profit business is to increase shareholder value (Jaskyte, 2014).
This comparison analysis highlights not only the social effects of directors’ actions but also the directors’ many responsibilities. Directors in all industries have considerable influence over the firms they oversee, with their decisions having direct effects on shareholders or the general public but also far-reaching repercussions for the greater good of society (Li, 2018).
Section 4: Conclusions
To be successful as a director, whether in the context of a business, an organisation, or a motion picture business, one needs a certain set of abilities, areas of expertise, and personal attributes. Directors need good leadership qualities to oversee teams and make weighty choices. When it comes to sharing their vision and understanding the thoughts of others, effective communication is really necessary. They need to be able to think strategically, have sound financial judgment, and be good at finding solutions to problems. Additionally, directors are expected to be adept at managing teams, flexible in the face of change, and have a solid basis in ethical and legal principles.
Because directors are often responsible for budgets and the planning of financial matters, they need to have a solid grasp of financial statements and effective budget management. Having suitable educational credentials, such as a master’s degree in business administration (MBA) or industry-specific certificates, may be advantageous in various fields. In addition, expertise in the industry, often acquired via lower-level employment, is typically required for consideration.
Directors are expected to have the flexibility to adjust to shifting market conditions, emerging technology, and corporate settings. They need to display a results-oriented approach and be able to make crucial choices that are in line with the goals of the firm. Directors need to have a distinct vision to succeed in creative industries such as the film industry or the art world. In addition, developing a network of connections inside your sector might help you get access to previously unavailable possibilities and give insightful information. Building up a solid professional reputation and expanding one’s network are other important factors to consider while trying to get a directing gig.
References:
- Darko, J., Aribi, Z.A. and Uzonwanne, G.C. (2016) ‘Corporate governance: The impact of director and board structure, ownership structure and corporate control on the performance of listed companies on the Ghana Stock Exchange’, Corporate Governance, 16(2), pp. 259–277. doi:10.1108/cg-11-2014-0133.
- Fuente, J.A., García-Sánchez, I.M. and Lozano, M.B. (2017) ‘The role of the Board of Directors in the adoption of GRI guidelines for the disclosure of CSR information’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, pp. 737–750. doi:1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.155.
- Fyall, R. (2016) ‘The power of nonprofits: Mechanisms for nonprofit policy influence’, Public Administration Review, 76(6), pp. 938–948. doi:1111/puar.12550.
- Harangozó, G. and Zilahy, G. (2015) ‘Cooperation between business and non-governmental organizations to promote sustainable development’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 89, pp. 18–31. doi:1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.092.
- Jaskyte, K. (2014) ‘Board of Directors and Innovation in Nonprofit Organizations Model: Preliminary Evidence from nonprofit organizations in developing countries’, VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(5), pp. 1920–1943. doi:1007/s11266-014-9505-7.
- Kalbuana, N. et al. (2022) ‘Effect of profitability, audit committee, company size, activity, and board of directors on Sustainability’, Cogent Business & Management, 9(1). doi:1080/23311975.2022.2129354.
- Li, H. (2018) ‘Leadership succession and the performance of Nonprofit Organizations: A fuzzy‐set qualitative comparative analysis’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 29(3), pp. 341–361. doi:1002/nml.21339.
- Mitchell, G.E., O’Leary, R. and Gerard, C. (2015) ‘Collaboration and performance: Perspectives from public managers and NGO leaders’, Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), pp. 684–716. doi:1080/15309576.2015.1031015.
- Naciti, V. (2019) ‘Corporate governance and board of directors: The effect of a board composition on firm Sustainability Performance’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, p. 117727. doi:1016/j.jclepro.2019.117727.
- Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016) ‘Social Responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance’, BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), pp. 137–151. doi:1016/j.brq.2015.08.001.
- Sanders, M.L. (2013) ‘Being nonprofit-like in a market economy’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(2), pp. 205–222. doi:10.1177/0899764013508606.
- Selden, S.C. and Sowa, J.E. (2015) ‘Voluntary turnover in nonprofit human service organizations: The impact of high performance work practices’, Human Service Organizations Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(3), pp. 182–207. doi:1080/23303131.2015.1031416.
- Zhu, H., Wang, P. and Bart, C. (2014) ‘Board processes, board strategic involvement, and organizational performance in for-profit and non-profit organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), pp. 311–328. doi:1007/s10551-014-2512-1.
