Digital transformation is a vital trend in today’s banking business, and this study gives a concise but thorough summary of Lloyds Banking Group’s approach to it. It highlights the difficulties encountered by the bank as a result of its antiquated legacy systems, which hinder flexibility and cause security worries. This research takes a look at the internal and external elements, as well as the competitive landscape, using frameworks like as SWOT, PESTLE, and Porter’s Five Forces (Culpepper & Reinke, 2014). The effects of digital transformation on several groups of people—including workers, bosses, consumers, vendors, and government agencies—are the primary topic of this research. In order to improve customer service and operational efficiency, it emphasizes the need for a culture transformation inside the bank to embrace innovation and new technology(Pu, 2023). A culture of innovation should be fostered, and investments in contemporary infrastructure like cloud technologies and API integration should be prioritized. Additionally, staff skills should be enhanced via continuous learning programs. Personalized services and Omni-channel assistance to educate and engage customers are also highlighted in the research (Delmas & Toffel, 2004).

In order to stay up with the latest technical developments, it is recommended to collaborate with fintech businesses and start-ups. Due to the heightened dangers in the digital realm, it is essential to suggest bolstering cyber security measures. To ensure that these projects are coordinated successfully, it is planned to create a Digital Transformation Office (DTO) (Mazikana, 2023). Finally, the paper stresses the need of Lloyds Banking Group taking a holistic and well-rounded strategy to digital transformation. Maintaining a competitive advantage and ensuring the bank’s long-term performance requires smart investments in technology, a focus on stakeholder involvement, and ongoing adaptability to the growing digital banking environment (Werth et al., 2020).

Section-1 Introduction

This study examines Lloyds Banking Group’s digital transformation challenges. The bank’s antiquated systems hinder digital transformation, thus this study identifies and analyses them (Cheng et al., 2023). This consultant-led study analyses how digital transformation affects a broad spectrum of internal and external stakeholders. Workers, shareholders, the company’s governing body, executive teams, internal committees, unions, customers, suppliers, creditors, the public, NGOs, and competitors are stakeholders(Loonam et al., 2018).. The study uses SWOT, PESTEL, Porter’s Generic Strategy, and Porter’s Five Forces to assess the market and Lloyds Banking Group’s shifting dynamics (Osei et al., 2023). Our goal is to deliver complete solutions that address digital transformation challenges and capitalize on the digital age’s opportunities for growth (Panta & Xygkogianni, 2022). This scientific approach will assist Lloyds Banking Group comprehend and strategically manage its digital transformation route, which is tough (Kornelakis et al., 2022).

Section-2 Challenges/problems the client is facing

Digital Transformation

Lloyds Banking Group in the UK has numerous major issues that are typical of established financial organizations transitioning to the digital age. Legacy systems lack the agility and flexibility of current technology, causing integration challenges, longer reaction times, and increased security threats. To adapt to this technology, the company must change its culture from conventional banking to innovation. Old-school personnel and consumers who struggle with digital interfaces may reject such a change (McNulty & Milne, 2021).

Online banking raises cyber security risks, requiring strong safeguards to secure sensitive consumer data and retain confidence. The tightly regulated banking industry makes digital transformation difficult since it must meet existing and growing regulatory norms. Changing client expectations like 24/7 access, tailored services, and seamless digital interactions complicate the change process. Lloyds Banking Group competes with fintech and digital-only challenger banks, which have more nimble business models and new technology. Lloyds must remain ahead in digital due to competition. Digital transformation involves significant investment and resource allocation, which may be difficult while maintaining corporate operations. Addressing the skills gap in the workforce is crucial since the digital transformation requires new skills and experience, which may need considerable training and new recruiting tactics (Loonam et al., 2018).

Legacy Systems

An important problem that is connected to the legacy systems of Lloyds Bank UK is now being struggled with. One of the most significant challenges that the bank has in its attempts to undergo digital transformation is the presence of these antiquated and rigid systems (Boratyńska, 2019). The bank’s capacity to react to quickly changing technology breakthroughs and effectively satisfy shifting consumer expectations is hindered by the legacy systems that it uses. These factors often lead to inefficiencies in operating procedures, higher expenses associated with maintenance, and a restricted capacity for innovation. To be successful in overcoming this obstacle, Lloyds Bank will need to begin on a complicated process of updating or replacing these old systems. This will involve a significant financial investment as well as a transition strategy that has been meticulously prepared to guarantee that there will be little interruption to the bank’s operations and service.

Section-3 Purpose of the report

The purpose of this paper is to comprehensively assess Lloyds Banking Group’s digital transformation issues. It identifies and analyses legacy system problems that hinder the bank’s digital transition (Kornelakis et al., 2022). This report examines how digital transformation affects internal and external stakeholders. Employees, shareholders, the board, management teams, internal committees, Employees unions, consumers, government and regulators, suppliers, creditors, community and society, NGOs, and rivals are stakeholders (Werth et al., 2020). The research uses SWOT, Porter’s Five Forces, PESTEL, and Porter’s Generic Strategy to analyse Lloyds Banking Group’s position and market dynamics. The ultimate objective is to provide well-rounded advice to successfully solve digital transformation difficulties and capitalize on digital era development and advancement prospects. This structured method seeks to comprehend Lloyds Banking Group’s digital transformation path and provide a strategic direction (Werth et al., 2020).

Section-4 Impact of research on stakeholders

List of Stakeholders

Here is the list of stakeholders of Lloyds Banking Group UK.

Internal Stakeholder

Employees

The effects of digital transition and the difficulties of using outdated systems are felt most acutely by employees. They will have to learn new things or find other ways to do things to accommodate the changing technology and procedures. Employee buy-in and participation are crucial to the success of digital projects (Saputra et al., 2023). Frustration from inefficiencies and limited capabilities is a common experience with legacy systems. Staff members are considered high-interest and high-power stakeholders in Mendelow’s Matrix because new technology implementations significantly affect their day-to-day work and job satisfaction.

Shareholders

Lloyds Banking Group’s long-term sustainability and financial returns are the primary concerns of its shareholders. Although essential, digital transformation may be hazardous and costly(Rodrigues et al., 2022). How well the bank is juggling these efforts with the upkeep and improvement of older systems is something that shareholders evaluate. Their investment and voting rights greatly influence strategic choices, placing them in a high-interest and high-power position in Mendelow’s Matrix.

Board of Directors & Management Team

It is up to the board of directors and the management team to resolve problems associated with legacy systems and to guide the digital transformation path. Operating efficiently, meeting regulatory requirements, innovating, and satisfying customers are all competing priorities (Gabion & Bolton, 1992). The future of the organization is significantly affected by their actions. Because of their outsized role in making critical strategic decisions, they are located in the high-interest and power quadrant of Medlow’s Matrix.

Internal Committees

Digital transformation activities and difficulties with legacy systems are mainly supervised and guided by internal committees, including those for innovation, risk management, and information technology (Gabion & Bolton, 1992). They try to plan, strategize, and stay in sync with the organization’s objectives. Their interest in these efforts is vital, yet their location in Mendelow’s Matrix fluctuates in power based on their duties and influence within the business.

Employees Union

Job security, working conditions, and employee rights are some of the workforce issues that Employees unions are worried about due to digital transformation. They speak out for the workers regarding talks and negotiations about these reforms. They care deeply about the well-being of their employees, making them high-interest stakeholders in Mendelow’s Matrix. However, they only can influence decisions, not make them directly (Fuqua et al., 2021).

External Stakeholder

Customers

Lloyds Banking Group’s customers feel the effects of the digital revolution and the aging infrastructure. They anticipate financial services that are up-to-date, effective, and protected (Rodrigues et al., 2022). Any interruption or lack of efficiency may affect customer happiness and loyalty. Customers are a bank’s most essential stakeholders in Mendelow’s Matrix because their happiness and loyalty are the lifeblood of the business (Demas & Toffee, 2004).

Policymakers and Authorities

The involvement of government and regulatory agencies in supervising the banking industry is substantial. Their primary concern is the legality of Lloyds Banking Group’s digital transition. Its legacy systems may compromise the bank’s capacity to comply with new regulations. Their regulatory authority gives them significant power in Mendelow’s Matrix, although their interest level might change. (Tardieu et al., 2020)

Suppliers

The digital transformation and legacy system policies of Lloyds Banking Group affect the technology and service providers who supply the bank. As a result of these changes, certain services may be discontinued, or new needs may arise. They may care little about the bank’s inner workings, but their influence may grow or shrink depending on the nature of their contract and the services they provide. (Pragmatic et al., 2019)

Creditors

Particularly during heavy investment in digital transformation and legacy system management, creditors worry about the bank’s financial stability and health. With these shifts in mind, they calculate their assets’ potential gain or loss. Creditors are high-interest, high-power stakeholders in Mendelow’s Matrix because of their investment choices’ influence on the bank’s strategy and their financial leverage. (Pragmatic et al., 2019)

Non-Governmental Organization

Everyone has a stake in knowing how the digital policies and activities of Lloyds Banking Group affect many social, economic, and environmental aspects. They may not be able to influence the bank’s actions directly, but they have a say in important matters like CSR and ethics. They have varied degrees of interest but are classified as low power in Mendelow’s Matrix. Gabion & Bolton, 1992).

Competitor

The way Lloyds Banking Group deals with the issues of digital transformation and legacy systems is closely watched by competitors. They could do well to familiarize themselves with the bank’s achievements and failures in these domains. They do not care much about or have any say in the bank’s day-to-day operations, but they have a vested interest in the big picture. (Gabriel & Pillai, 2021)

Section-5 Evaluation and analysis of secondary data

SWOT Analysis of Stakeholders of Lloyds Banking Group (For internal environmental analysis)

Building on the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats research conducted by Lloyds Banking Group, this part focuses on the challenges that are connected with digital transformation and the elimination or incorporation of outdated systems (Up, 2023):

Strengths:      

Multiple Groups of Interest:

The fact that Lloyds Banking Group serves a wide customer provides them an advantage when it comes to putting digital technologies to the test. By testing new technologies in certain industries before implementing them throughout the whole system, it is possible to mitigate the risks associated with system-wide changes (Pskov & Globin, 2020).

Strong Fan Following:

When making the transition to digital, it may be highly beneficial to have a fan following that is committed to your brand. Customers who fall within this category are more likely to remain loyal to the bank despite any challenges that may be encountered as a consequence of the implementation of new systems or the retirement of outdated ones (Wardhani & Wang, 2022).

Competent Staff:

A digital transformation is impossible to achieve if the bank does not have staff that are trained and experienced. It is vital for them to have knowledge of both banking and new digital technologies in order to link the old and new systems. Knowledge of both is necessary in order to guarantee continuity and efficiency (Werth et al., 2020).

Connections with the Authorities:

In order for digital banks to effectively traverse the complex compliance environment, it is vital for them to establish and maintain good relationships with regulatory authorities. This is particularly true during system updates, which bring new technology that may include different regulatory requirements (Baxter, 2019).

Weaknesses:

Disputes of Interest that May Arise:

Existence of Potential Conflicts of Interest Weaknesses: When the organization transitions to new digital platforms, departments that are more used to legacy systems and those that are more keen to innovate digitally may find themselves in conflict with one another(Werth et al., 2020).

Sensitivity to One’s Reputation:

System failures or data breaches that are the result of poorly managed digital transformation programs have the potential to result in significant harm to the bank’s image (Wardhani & Wang, 2022).

Contempt for Progress:

One of the potential obstacles that might impede the digital transformation activities of the bank is a lack of excitement for change, especially with regard to the decision to replace outdated technologies. As a consequence of this, the bank’s levels of competitiveness in the rapidly evolving world of digital banking are reduced (Litvishko et al., 2020)..

Examining the Rules:

An Examination of the Regulations If the financial institution is too cautious in its efforts to comply with regulations, it may be able to postpone the incorporation of new technology, so reducing its ability to rapidly embrace and acquire the advantages of digital innovations (Nasution et al., 2023)..

Opportunities:

Changes in the Digital World:

Through the replacement or upgrading of obsolete technology, Lloyds Banking Group has the opportunity to modernize its services, improve the quality of the customer experience, and streamline its operations. These opportunities are made possible by the ever-evolving digital world (Aghion & Bolton, 1992).

Participation of Stakeholders:

Involving customers, workers, and investors in the process of digital transformation may result in the acquisition of priceless insights, promote more buy-in for new systems, and make it possible to develop digital solutions that are more customized (Nasution et al., 2023.

Diversification:

The introduction of new digital initiatives presents potential for diversification of offers, such as the provision of products or services that are only available digitally. This has the potential to attract new kinds of clients and bring in more revenue (Litvishko et al., 2020).

Environmentally Friendly Steps:

In accordance with the growing environmental consciousness among investors and consumers, digitization may boost the bank’s sustainability activities by reducing the amount of paper used and the footprints left by branches.

Threats:

Changing Institutional Frameworks:

Risks Associated with Developing Systematic Frameworks: There is a possibility that significant obstacles will be presented by the incorporation of new standards with both legacy systems and new digital platforms, in addition to the quick changes in regulations governing digital banking.

Uncertainty in the Economy:

Uncertainty in the Economy: Alterations in the economy may have an impact on the bank’s ability to invest in digital infrastructure that is required, as well as the consumers’ willingness to adopt new digital banking services (Litvishko et al., 2020).

Market Conditions:

In the current market conditions, the competitive landscape, which includes an increasing number of fintech businesses and other competitors who are proficient in digital technology, poses a significant threat, especially if these competitors are faster to adopt new technologies (Nasution et al., 2023).

Problems with Cyber security:

In recent years, there has been an increase in the level of concern over cybercrime, particularly for Lloyds Banking Group and other financial institutions that put a high value on the trust of their customers and the safety of their data (Kumar et al., 2015).

Porter’s Five Forces of Digital Transformation in challenges in Legacy system of Lloyd Banking Group. U.K. (For Industry Analysis)

The competitive dynamics of any industry or market may be examined using Porter’s Five Forces paradigm. An application to the difficulties of digital transformation in the U.K.’s Lloyd Banking Group’s antiquated systems reveals essential considerations in this effort. The results of Porter’s Five Forces study are as follows (Grundy, 2006):

Threat of New Entrants

Traditional financial institutions such as Lloyds Bank Group are facing a big challenge as a result of the introduction of fintech start-ups and digital banks into the banking sector. This change is causing the industry to undergo a considerable transformation. Unencumbered by old systems, these new entrants are nimble and imaginative, swiftly adopting cutting-edge technology and personalizing their services to fit the ever-changing requirements of their customers. Keeping up with this level of agility is the issue that Lloyds faces. It is possible that its legacy systems, despite their dependability, might hold down innovation and adaption, which could possibly make it less competitive in comparison to these new technologies. To ensure that it continues to retain a strong competitive position, the bank must make strategic investments in modernizing its processes and technology in order to shorten the amount of time it takes to bring new services to market.

Bargaining Power of Suppliers:

Within the context of the digital transformation journey, the dependence of Lloyds Bank Group on technology providers has a substantial impact on the negotiating power of the organization. The complexity of integrating new technologies with legacy systems that are already in place contributes to the increased dependence on these technologies. It is possible that suppliers of specialized technological solutions, which are necessary for the modernization of legacy systems, have been given more influence in negotiations(Muryanto, 2022). In order to avoid being too dependent on a small number of suppliers, Lloyds must cultivate robust and mutually beneficial relationships with these suppliers while also investigating other alternatives. This will ensure that the company is able to maintain a healthy balance of power within these vital partnerships.

Bargaining Power of Customers:

Customers who use financial services today are increasingly self-sufficient and have greater expectations for digital services, which has a direct influence on Lloyds Bank Group employees. The bank’s legacy systems, which may impede the speed and flexibility of putting out new digital solutions, are one of the factors that contribute to the bank’s inability to satisfy these objectives. It is possible that customers, who are aware of the digital capabilities of other banks and fintech businesses, would seek services that are more revolutionary and efficient. At the same time as Lloyds must emphasize the importance of a customer-centric approach in its digital transformation plan, the company must concentrate on improving its digital capabilities and the customer experience in order to keep its existing customer base and attract new customers.

Threat of Substitute Products or Services:

As a result of the proliferation of alternative financial services, such as peer-to-peer lending platforms, online financial advisers, and digital wallets, Lloyds Bank Group is facing a serious challenge in the shape of potentially competing alternatives(Muryanto, 2022). When compared to conventional banking services, these services are often more nimble and inventive, and they cater to a certain section of clients who are looking for convenience and experiences that are digital-first. In the absence of a rapid acceleration of its digital transition, Lloyds’ old systems may make it more difficult for the company to compete with these replacement applications. In order to maintain its relevance in a wider financial services market that is increasingly dominated by digital solutions, the bank must consistently innovate. This is not just what is required to stay up with conventional rivals, but it is also necessary for the bank to innovate.

Intensity of Competitive Rivalry

Existing rivals in the banking industry are engaged in a fierce competition, notably in the area of digital transformation. Banks are making fast investments in digital technology in order to improve the overall client experience and the efficiency of their operations. This is a continuous challenge for Lloyds Bank Group, since it not only requires the shift away from old technologies but also requires the company to innovate at a rate that is equivalent to that of its rivals. If this is not done, there is a possibility that market share may be lost. Therefore, in order to maintain its competitive edge in this rapidly changing digital world, Lloyds has to carefully manage its resources, concentrate on product innovation that is cantered on the client, and make use of emerging technology.

PESTLE Analysis of Digital Transformation of Lloyd Banking Group. U.K. (For external environment analysis)

The external macro environmental elements that might affect an organization are analysed using PESTLE. Let’s do a PESTLE study on the U.K.’s Lloyd Banking Group’s digital transformation (Mazikana, 2023):

Political Factor

The regulatory framework in which Lloyd Banking Group works is influenced by politics. The banking industry in the United Kingdom is closely regulated by several government entities (Rangkuti et al., 2020). For the bank’s digital transformation to succeed, it must keep up with the ever-shifting regulatory and compliance environment, particularly regarding digital financial services. The bank’s digital strategy and investments are sensitive to the political climate and government legislation affecting the financial services industry (Muryanto, 2022).

Economic Factor

Financial factors are crucial to the Lloyd Banking Group’s digital development. The health and growth of the U.K. economy are essential to the bank’s ability to invest in cutting-edge technologies and new products (Ahdallah et al., 2023). Inflation, interest rates, and the state of the economy are all examples of macroeconomic issues that might influence individual decisions about saving and borrowing (Rangkuti et al., 2020). The cost of financing digital transformation efforts is affected by the Bank of England’s interest rates and monetary policy choices (Mazikana, 2023).

Social Factors:

Consider how societal concerns, such as changing customer demographics and preferences, might affect your business. Lloyds Banking Group must know that customers’ needs constantly evolve (Ablyazov & Asaul, 2018). Mobile banking applications and other forms of digital banking, such as online account management, are becoming more popular. Additionally, clients demand individualized service that meets their specific monetary requirements and preferences (Ahdallah et al., 2023). The bank’s capacity to adjust its digital products in response to changing social trends depends on its understanding of underlying social dynamics (Longo et al., 1998).

Technological Factors:

Technological Considerations point in Lloyds Banking Group’s digital transformation (Pu et al., 2021). Fintech, block chain, AI, and cyber security are just a few examples of the constantly evolving technical world in which the bank must operate. Maintaining technological superiority and safety is providing cutting-edge digital services while maintaining data security and privacy requires infrastructure, software, and digital skills investments.

Environmental Factors:

Sustainability and energy efficiency are examples of environmental issues Customers and authors increasingly demand sustainable banking practices in response to rising environmental concerns (Ablyazov & Asaul, 2018). Lloyd Banking Group has to assess how well its digital transformation efforts support its sustainability objectives, such as cutting down on waste. The bank may do its part for the environment by using efficient data centres regarding energy consumption and resources (Ahdallah et al., 2023).

Legal Factors:

Regarding data security and consumer rights, legal considerations rank high on the priorities in digital banking (Longo et al., 1998). Customer data is governed by strict data protection rules like GDPR, highlighting the need for strong cyber security and data privacy protections. Fair and responsible banking practices are ensured through the bank’s digital goods and services, which are heavily influenced by consumer protection legislation and financial regulations (Pu et al., 2021).

Ethical Factors:

Ethical concerns, which include responsible lending and ethical investing alternatives, are becoming more critical in the banking industry. Customers and other stakeholders put a premium on ethically performing businesses (Pu et al., 2021). Therefore, Lloyd Banking Group should do the same. Aligning with society’s expectations and improving the bank’s image may be accomplished by incorporating responsible lending procedures and offering ethical investing options inside its digital services (Ablyazov & Asaul, 2018).

Recommendations and conclusion.

The suggestions for Lloyds Banking Group in the context of digital transformation and management of stakeholders, with additional subheadings and explanations in further detail (Tsindeliani et al., 2021):

Investment in Today’s State-of-the-Art Infrastructure

The paper stresses the benefits of cloud technology for scalability, flexibility, and affordability. It advises phased migration of important banking systems and data to secure cloud platforms with trustworthy cloud service providers and regulatory compliance. It also recommends APIs to foster innovation and third-party cooperation (Do et al., 2022).

Management of the Training and Change Process for Employees

The paper suggests a continuous learning program on digital technology, cyber security, and client-focused service delivery to equip personnel with digital skills. It also emphasizes the need to identify and develop organizational change champions to promote cultural change and innovation (Culpepper & Reinke, 2014).

Education of the Customer and Engagement of the Customer

The research recommends live chat, specialised helplines, video tutorials, and thorough FAQs for consumers along their digital journey. Customer experiences should be improved via data analytics and AI personalization. Customer feedback forms and surveys should be used for continual development.

Collaboration with Fintech & New Start-ups

A dedicated open banking group or department is recommended to encourage fintech collaboration. The research also recommends investing in fintech firms to obtain cutting-edge technologies and collaborate and acquire to innovate (Bolourforoush & Jahankhani, 2023).

Additional Steps to Improve Cyber security

The study emphasizes staff cyber security education via training and awareness initiatives. Constant monitoring for real-time threat detection, security audits, and incident response planning may help safeguard client data from security breaches (Breidbach et al., 2019).

Establishing a Digital Transformation Office (DTO)

A DTO would lead and coordinate digital activities. Change management, project managers, and digital strategy specialists would supervise digital initiatives to meet organizational goals in the DTO(Shin & Cheng, 2023).

Continuous Evaluation of Stakeholder Input

The report emphasises frequent stakeholder satisfaction, staff involvement, and customer experience evaluations. KPIs should be set and data reviewed periodically to alter digital approaches depending on stakeholder input (Zachariadis & Ozcan, 2016).

References.

Ablyazov, T. and Asaul, V. (2018) ‘On the competitive potential of the organization under conditions of New Industrial Base Formation,’ SHS Web of Conferences, 44, p. 00003. doi:10.1051/shsconf/20184400003.

Abdallah, M.Y. and Sukarno, S. (2023) ‘Indonesian Digital Bank Stock Valuation: Case Study of Bank Jago in 2022’, International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 06(02). doi:10.47191/ijcsrr/v6-i2-19.

Aghion, P. and Bolton, P. (1992) ‘An incomplete contracts approach to financial contracting,’ The Review of Economic Studies, 59(3), p. 473. doi:10.2307/2297860.

Baxter, G. (2019) ‘A strategic analysis of Cargolux Airlines International position in the global air cargo supply chain using Porter’s five forces model,’ Infrastructures, 4(1), p. 6. doi:10.3390/infrastructures4010006.

Bolourforoush, A.K. and Jahankhani, H. (2023) ‘Security challenges of digital transformation in smart cities: Case of the banking sector,’ Technology and Talent Strategies for Sustainable Smart Cities, pp. 247–273. doi:10.1108/978-1-83753-022-920231012.

Boratyńska, K. (2019) ‘Impact of digital transformation on value creation in fintech services: An innovative approach’, Journal of Promotion Management, 25(5), pp. 631–639. doi:10.1080/10496491.2019.1585543.

Breidbach, C.F., Keating, B.W. and Lim, C. (2019) ‘Fintech: Research Directions to explore the digital transformation of Financial Service Systems’, Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 30(1), pp. 79–102. doi:10.1108/jstp-08-2018-0185.

Bruijl, G.H. (2018) ‘The relevance of Porter’s five forces in today’s innovative and changing business environment,’ SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3192207.

Cheng, S., Fan, Q. and Huang, M. (2023) ‘Strategic orientation, dynamic capabilities, and digital transformation of commercial banks: A fuzzy-set QCA approach’, Sustainability, 15(3), p. 1915. doi:10.3390/su15031915

Chowdhury, S. et al. (2023) ‘Transforming brownfields into urban greenspaces: A working process for stakeholder analysis,’ PLOS ONE, 18(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0278747.

Culpepper, P.D. and Reinke, R. (2014) ‘Structural Power and bank bailouts in the United Kingdom and the United States,’ Politics & Society, 42(4), pp. 427–454. doi:10.1177/0032329214547342.

Dias, S., Espadinha-Cruz, P. and Matos, F. (2023) ‘A Porter’s five forces model proposal for Additive Manufacturing Technology: A case study in Portuguese industry,’ Procedia Computer Science, 217, pp. 165–176. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.212.

Diener, F. and Špaček, M. (2021) ‘Digital Transformation in banking: A managerial perspective on barriers to change,’ Sustainability, 13(4), p. 2032. doi:10.3390/su13042032.

Delmas, M. and Toffel, M.W. (2004) ‘Stakeholders and Environmental Management Practices: An institutional framework,’ Business Strategy and the Environment, 13(4), pp. 209–222. doi:10.1002/bse.409.

Do, T.D. et al. (2022) ‘The Impact of digital transformation on performance: Evidence from vietnamese commercial banks’, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(1), p. 21. doi:10.3390/jrfm15010021.

Gebrihet, H.G. and Pillay, P. (2021) ‘Emerging challenges and prospects of digital transformation and stakeholders integration in urban land administration in Ethiopia’, Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 13(3), pp. 341–356. doi:10.1177/09749101211034097.

Ghemawat, P. (2002) ‘Competition and business strategy in historical perspective’, Business History Review, 76(1), pp. 37–74. doi:10.2307/4127751.

George, G. and Schillebeeckx, S.J.D. (2022) ‘Digital Transformation, sustainability, and purpose in the multinational enterprise’, Journal of World Business, 57(3), p. 101326. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2022.101326.

Grundy, T. (2006) ‘Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter’s Five forces model,’ Strategic Change, 15(5), pp. 213–229. doi:10.1002/jsc.764.

Harris, W.L. and Wonglimpiyarat, J. (2023) ‘Fintech and the digital transformation of the Banking Landscape’, The Fintech Disruption, pp. 53–73. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-23069-1_3.

Imran, A. and Okai-Ugbaje, S. (2022) ‘Complexities and challenges of multi-stakeholder involvement in digital transformation in the Global South: The machine-readable passport project in Bangladesh,’ Innovation Practices for Digital Transformation in the Global South, pp. 16–33. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12825-7_2

Jaroli, L., Gupta, S. and Dashora, P. (2022) ‘Banks to lead digital transformation with Artificial Intelligence,’ Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Organizational Transformation, pp. 361–385. doi:10.1002/9781119710301.ch21.

Kornelakis, A., Kirov, V. and Thill, P. (2022) ‘The Digitalisation of service work: A Comparative Study of restructuring of the banking sector in the United Kingdom and Luxembourg,’ European Journal of Industrial Relations, 28(3), pp. 253–272. doi:10.1177/09596801211056829.

Kızıldağ, D. and Uğurlu, Ö.Y. (2023) ‘Digitalization and business’, Advances in Logistics, Operations, and Management Science, pp. 69–85. doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-9261-1.ch004.

Khattak, M.A. et al. (2023) ‘Digital Transformation, diversification and stability: What do we know about banks?’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 78, pp. 122–132. doi:10.1016/j.eap.2023.03.004.

Kumar, P., Dass, M. and Kumar, S. (2015) ‘From competitive advantage to nodal advantage: Ecosystem structure and the new five forces that affect prosperity,’ Business Horizons, 58(4), pp. 469–481. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2015.04.001.

Litvishko, O. et al. (2020) ‘Impact of the digital economy on the banking sector,’ E3S Web of Conferences, 159, p. 04033. doi:10.1051/e3sconf/202015904033.

Longo, C.R., Cox, M.A. and Edgeman, R.L. (1998) ‘Whither banking in the United Kingdom: Is total quality management the answer?’, Quality Engineering, 11(2), pp. 317–325. doi:10.1080/08982119808919244.

Loonam, J. et al. (2018) ‘Towards digital transformation: Lessons learned from traditional organizations’, Strategic Change, 27(2), pp. 101–109. doi:10.1002/jsc.2185.

Matt, C., Hess, T. and Benlian, A. (2015) ‘Digital Transformation Strategies,’ Business & Information Systems Engineering, 57(5), pp. 339–343. doi:10.1007/s12599-015-0401-5.

Mazikana, A.T. (2023) ‘Application of pastel factors: A case of financial institutions’, SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4380768.

McNulty, D. and Milne, A. (2021) ‘Bigger fish to fry: Fintech and the digital transformation of Financial Services’, Palgrave Studies in Financial Services Technology, pp. 263–281. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-81835-7_10.

M, R.A. et al. (2022) ‘Customer relationship management in banking in the UK industry: Case of Lloyds Bank’, ECS Transactions, 107(1), pp. 14325–14333. doi:10.1149/10701.14325ecst.

Muryanto, Y.T. (2022) ‘The urgency of Sharia compliance regulations for Islamic FINTECHS: A comparative study of Indonesia, Malaysia and the United Kingdom,’ Journal of Financial Crime [Preprint]. doi:10.1108/jfc-05-2022-0099.

Naimi-Sadigh, A., Asgari, T. and Rabiei, M. (2021) ‘Digital transformation in the value chain disruption of banking services’, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), pp. 1212–1242. doi:10.1007/s13132-021-00759-0.

Nasution, H. et al. (2023) ‘Business strategy through SWOT analysis in implementing loan origination system to improve bank’s business performance (Case study at mortgage credit),’ Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Business, Management, and Entrepreneurship (GCBME 2022), pp. 1593–1602. doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-234-7_167.

Osei, L.K., Cherkasova, Y. and Oware, K.M. (2023) ‘Unlocking the full potential of digital transformation in banking: A Bibliometric Review and emerging trend’, Future Business Journal, 9(1). doi:10.1186/s43093-023-00207-2.

Panta, M. and Xygkogianni, M. (2022) ‘Pest analysis of Greece’s external environment in the view of digital transformation of SMEs’, Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, pp. 1–13. doi:10.47260/bej/1211.

Peshkova, G.Y. and Zlobina, O.V. (2020) ‘Digital transformation of banking with speech technologies’, European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences [Preprint]. doi:10.15405/epsbs.2020.10.03.34.

Pramanik, H.S., Kirtania, M. and Pani, A.K. (2019) ‘Essence of digital transformation—manifestations at large financial institutions from North America,’ Future Generation Computer Systems, 95, pp. 323–343. doi:10.1016/j.future.2018.12.003.

Priharsari, D. et al. (2023) ‘National Digital Strategy Development: Guidelines and Lesson Learnt from Asia Pacific countries’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, p. 122855. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122855.

Pu, X. (2023) ‘SWOT analysis of the digital transformation of Inclusive Finance of Chinese commercial banks’, Applied Economics and Policy Studies, pp. 1085–1096. doi:10.1007/978-981-19-7826-5_104.

Pu, R. et al. (2021) ‘The interaction between banking sector and financial technology companies: Qualitative Assessment—a case of Lithuania,’ Risks, 9(1), p. 21. doi:10.3390/risks9010021.

Rangkuti, R.P. et al. (2020) ‘Fintech growth impact on govemment banking business model: Case study of bank XYZ’, 2020 8th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) [Preprint]. doi:10.1109/icoict49345.2020.9166227.

Richard, O.C. (2000) ‘Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A Resource-based view,’ Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), pp. 164–177. doi:10.5465/1556374.

Rodrigues, A.R. et al. (2022) ‘Artificial Intelligence, Digital Transformation and cybersecurity in the banking sector: A multi-stakeholder cognition-driven framework,’ Research in International Business and Finance, 60, p. 101616. doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101616.

Saputra, I., Murwaningsari, E. and Augustine, Y. (2023) ‘Enterprise risk management, management control systems, and digital banking transformation analysis on the evaluation of sustainable banking in Indonesian banking,’ Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(3). doi:10.55908/sdgs.v11i3.715.

Saputra, I., Murwaningsari, E. and Augustine, Y. (2023) ‘The role of Enterprise Risk Management and digital transformation on sustainable banking in Indonesia,’ Neo Journal of Economy and Social Humanities, 2(1), pp. 17–30. doi:10.56403/nejesh.v2i1.85.

Seppänen, S., Saunila, M. and Ukko, J. (2023) ‘Digital transformation of organizational and management controls—review and recommendations for the future,’ Management and Industrial Engineering, pp. 1–25. doi:10.1007/978-3-031-42060-3_1.

Shin, N. and Cheng, T.C.E. (2023) ‘Gaining user confidence in banking industry’s quest for Digital Transformation: A product-service system management perspective,’ Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(8), pp. 2216–2240. doi:10.1108/imds-06-2022-0358.

Shivakumar, S.K. (2018) ‘Digital Transformation: A Project Management Case Study,’ Complete Guide to Digital Project Management, pp. 415–446. doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-3417-4_17.

Svatoš, O. (2020) ‘Digitalization in retail banking’, Intelligent Systems Reference Library, pp. 367–382. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49640-1_19.

Tardieu, H. et al. (2020) ‘Case study 7: The Digital Transformation of banking—an industry changing beyond recognition’, Deliberately Digital, pp. 281–292. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37955-1_28.

Tsindeliani, I.A. et al. (2021) ‘Digital transformation of the banking system in the context of sustainable development,’ Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(1), pp. 165–180. doi:10.1108/jmlc-02-2021-0011.

Ufua, D.E. et al. (2021) ‘Digital Transformation: A conceptual framing for attaining sustainable development goals 4 and 9 in Nigeria’, Journal of Management & Organization, 27(5), pp. 836–849. doi:10.1017/jmo.2021.45.

Wardhani, R.A. and Wang, G. (2022) ‘Digital transformation planning based on Big Data Technology (case study: XYZ Bank),’ Jurnal Manajemen Informatika (JAMIKA), 12(2), pp. 112–125. doi:10.34010/jamika.v12i2.7876.

Werth, O. et al. (2020) ‘Influencing factors for the digital transformation in the Financial Services Sector’, Zeitschrift für die gesamte Versicherungswissenschaft, 109(2–4), pp. 155–179. doi:10.1007/s12297-020-00486-6.

Zachariadis, M. and Ozcan, P. (2016) ‘The API economy and Digital Transformation in financial services: The case of open banking,’ SSRN Electronic Journal [Preprint]. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2975199.